You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Thermal Niche Differentiation in the Benthic Diatom Cylindrotheca closterium (Bacillariophyceae) Complex
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01395 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Willem Stock, Bart Vanelslander, Franziska Rüdiger, Koen Sabbe, Wim Vyverman, Ulf Karsten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
Luxembourg | 1 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
Croatia | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 6 | 55% |
Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 24 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 9% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 27 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,564,458
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,530
of 25,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,389
of 352,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#138
of 629 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 629 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.