↓ Skip to main content

Nitric Oxide Dismutase (nod) Genes as a Functional Marker for the Diversity and Phylogeny of Methane-Driven Oxygenic Denitrifiers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nitric Oxide Dismutase (nod) Genes as a Functional Marker for the Diversity and Phylogeny of Methane-Driven Oxygenic Denitrifiers
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baoli Zhu, Jiaqi Wang, Lauren M. Bradford, Katharina Ettwig, Baolan Hu, Tillmann Lueders

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 31%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 18%
Environmental Science 7 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Engineering 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,576,397
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,470
of 25,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,227
of 346,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#392
of 645 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 645 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.