You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dual DNA Barcoding for the Molecular Identification of the Agents of Invasive Fungal Infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01647 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Minh Thuy Vi Hoang, Laszlo Irinyi, Sharon C. A. Chen, Tania C. Sorrell, The ISHAM Barcoding of Medical Fungi Working Group, Wieland Meyer, Michael Arabatzis, Ian Arthur, Jose F. Cano-Lira, Gianluigi Cardinali, Laura Rosio Castañón, Sharon Chen, Wen Chen, Ariya Chindamporn, Arnaldo L. Colombo, Marie Desnos-Ollivier, Wilhelm de Beer, Sybren de Hoog, Françoise Dromer, Dea Garcia-Hermoso, Marieka Gryzenhout, Josep Guarro, Catriona Halliday, Marijke Hendrickx, Sabine Huhndorf, Laszlo Irinyi, C. Andre Levesque, Wieland Meyer, Maria Luiza Moretti, Mauro de Medeiros Muniz, Analy Salles de Azevedo Melo, Angela Satie Nishikaku, Anne-Cécile Normand, Célia Pais, Renaud Piarroux, Stéphane Ranque, Barbara Robbertse, Vincent Robert, Conrad L. Schoch, Keith A. Seifert, Célia Maria de Almeida Soares, Tania C. Sorrell, John L. Spouge, Dirk Stubbe, Maria Lucia Taylor, Conchita Toriello, Aristea Velegraki, Chompoonek Yurayart, Rosely Maria Zancopé-Oliveira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 45 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 45 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,257,349
of 24,219,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#722
of 27,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,782
of 350,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22
of 642 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,219,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 642 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.