You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Classification of Multiple DNA Dyes Based on Inhibition Effects on Real-Time Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP): Prospect for Point of Care Setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02234 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Than Linh Quyen, Tien Anh Ngo, Dang Duong Bang, Mogens Madsen, Anders Wolff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 17% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 53 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,680,249
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,386
of 29,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,093
of 368,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#100
of 744 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 744 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.