↓ Skip to main content

Differently Pre-treated Alfalfa Silages Affect the in vitro Ruminal Microbiota Composition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differently Pre-treated Alfalfa Silages Affect the in vitro Ruminal Microbiota Composition
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02761
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Hartinger, Joan E. Edwards, Ruth Gómez Expósito, Hauke Smidt, Cajo J. F. ter Braak, Nina Gresner, Karl-Heinz Südekum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Lecturer 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 33%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Unknown 13 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#13,140,583
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,064
of 25,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,874
of 461,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#255
of 653 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 653 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.