You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computer-Aided Design of Antimicrobial Peptides: Are We Generating Effective Drug Candidates?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03097 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marlon H. Cardoso, Raquel Q. Orozco, Samilla B. Rezende, Gisele Rodrigues, Karen G. N. Oshiro, Elizabete S. Cândido, Octávio L. Franco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 25% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 249 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Professor | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 88 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 56 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 100 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,296,384
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,809
of 29,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,148
of 481,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#73
of 657 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 657 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.