↓ Skip to main content

Foraging at Solid Urban Waste Disposal Sites as Risk Factor for Cephalosporin and Colistin Resistant Escherichia coli Carriage in White Storks (Ciconia ciconia)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Foraging at Solid Urban Waste Disposal Sites as Risk Factor for Cephalosporin and Colistin Resistant Escherichia coli Carriage in White Storks (Ciconia ciconia)
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ursula Höfle, Juan Jose Gonzalez-Lopez, Maria Cruz Camacho, Marc Solà-Ginés, Albert Moreno-Mingorance, Jose Manuel Hernández, Javier De La Puente, Javier Pineda-Pampliega, José Ignacio Aguirre, Fernando Torres-Medina, Antoni Ramis, Natalia Majó, Julio Blas, Lourdes Migura-Garcia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 15%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,416,167
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,824
of 29,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,228
of 428,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#80
of 934 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 934 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.