↓ Skip to main content

Age Matters: Community Assembly in the Pig Fecal Microbiome in the First Month of Life

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age Matters: Community Assembly in the Pig Fecal Microbiome in the First Month of Life
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.564408
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie D. Jurburg, Alex Bossers

Abstract

Despite the wealth of research into strategies for microbiome modulation, studies of microbiome management in pig hosts have found mixed results. A refined understanding of the patterns of microbiome assembly during the host's early life, when management strategies are most commonly applied, is necessary for the development of successful management practices. Here, we study the development of the pig gut microbial community in a monitoring experiment, sampling the microbiome of pigs in a commercial farm intensively during the first month of life. We found that the community's taxonomic richness increased linearly with host age. Furthermore, rapid changes across communities occurred in stages, and non-linear patterns in relative abundance were commonly observed among dominant taxa across host age, consistent with primary succession. Our results highlight the importance of understanding the patterns of microbiome assembly during host development, and identify successional stages as windows of opportunity for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 35%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,931,482
of 25,210,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14,450
of 28,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,134
of 429,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#488
of 898 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,210,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 898 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.