You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of Selection Methods to Develop Novel Phage Therapy Cocktails Against Antimicrobial Resistant Clinical Isolates of Bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2021.613529 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa E. K. Haines, Francesca E. Hodges, Janet Y. Nale, Jennifer Mahony, Douwe van Sinderen, Joanna Kaczorowska, Bandar Alrashid, Mahmuda Akter, Nathan Brown, Dominic Sauvageau, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén, Anisha M. Thanki, Andrew D. Millard, Edouard E. Galyov, Martha R. J. Clokie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Kenya | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 8 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 64 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 69 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,262,587
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#730
of 29,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,579
of 457,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#26
of 869 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 869 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.