You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Statistical and Machine Learning Techniques in Human Microbiome Studies: Contemporary Challenges and Solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2021.635781 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabel Moreno-Indias, Leo Lahti, Miroslava Nedyalkova, Ilze Elbere, Gennady Roshchupkin, Muhamed Adilovic, Onder Aydemir, Burcu Bakir-Gungor, Enrique Carrillo-de Santa Pau, Domenica D’Elia, Mahesh S. Desai, Laurent Falquet, Aycan Gundogdu, Karel Hron, Thomas Klammsteiner, Marta B. Lopes, Laura Judith Marcos-Zambrano, Cláudia Marques, Michael Mason, Patrick May, Lejla Pašić, Gianvito Pio, Sándor Pongor, Vasilis J. Promponas, Piotr Przymus, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Alexia Sampri, Rajesh Shigdel, Blaz Stres, Ramona Suharoschi, Jaak Truu, Ciprian-Octavian Truică, Baiba Vilne, Dimitrios Vlachakis, Ercument Yilmaz, Georg Zeller, Aldert L. Zomer, David Gómez-Cabrero, Marcus J. Claesson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 9% |
| Ireland | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 63% |
| Scientists | 21 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,013,496
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#558
of 29,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,624
of 454,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#25
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.