You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advances and Perspectives for Genome Editing Tools of Corynebacterium glutamicum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2021.654058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qingzhuo Wang, Jiao Zhang, Naief H. Al Makishah, Xiaoman Sun, Zhiqiang Wen, Yu Jiang, Sheng Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 17% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,964,950
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#11,461
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,272
of 454,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#397
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.