↓ Skip to main content

Optimization and Clinical Validation of Colorimetric Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, a Fast, Highly Sensitive and Specific COVID-19 Molecular Diagnostic Tool That Is…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimization and Clinical Validation of Colorimetric Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, a Fast, Highly Sensitive and Specific COVID-19 Molecular Diagnostic Tool That Is Robust to Detect SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.713713
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro A. Alves, Ellen G. de Oliveira, Ana Paula M. Franco-Luiz, Letícia T. Almeida, Amanda B. Gonçalves, Iara A. Borges, Flávia de S. Rocha, Raissa P. Rocha, Matheus F. Bezerra, Pâmella Miranda, Flávio D. Capanema, Henrique R. Martins, Gerald Weber, Santuza M. R. Teixeira, Gabriel Luz Wallau, Rubens L. do Monte-Neto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 36 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 37 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#16,099,039
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14,676
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,359
of 515,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#497
of 1,057 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,057 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.