You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multicenter Performance Evaluation of MALDI-TOF MS for Rapid Detection of Carbapenemase Activity in Enterobacterales: The Future of Networking Data Analysis With Online Software
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2021.789731 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva Gato, Ahalieyah Anantharajah, Manuel J. Arroyo, María José Artacho, Juan de Dios Caballero, Ana Candela, Kateřina Chudějová, Ignacio Pedro Constanso, Cristina Elías, Javier Fernández, Jesús Jiménez, Pilar Lumbreras, Gema Méndez, Xavier Mulet, Patricia Pérez-Palacios, Belén Rodríguez-Sánchez, Rafael Cantón, Jaroslav Hrabák, Luis Mancera, Luis Martínez-Martínez, Antonio Oliver, Álvaro Pascual, Alexia Verroken, Germán Bou, Marina Oviaño |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 60% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,010,784
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,257
of 25,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,095
of 504,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#202
of 1,112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.