↓ Skip to main content

Fungus Pichia kudriavzevii XTY1 and heterotrophic nitrifying bacterium Enterobacter asburiae GS2 cannot efficiently transform organic nitrogen via hydroxylamine and nitrite

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fungus Pichia kudriavzevii XTY1 and heterotrophic nitrifying bacterium Enterobacter asburiae GS2 cannot efficiently transform organic nitrogen via hydroxylamine and nitrite
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1038599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianyue Xu, Simeng Song, Baihui Ren, Jiahuan Li, Jiyun Yang, Long Bai, Zhongyun Piao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,448,020
of 26,005,389 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,886
of 30,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#343,223
of 489,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#710
of 1,171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,005,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 489,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.