You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ecological Effects of Daily Antiseptic Treatment on Microbial Composition of Saliva-Grown Microcosm Biofilms and Selection of Resistant Phenotypes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2022.934525 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaojun Mao, Andreas Hiergeist, David L. Auer, Konstantin J. Scholz, Denise Muehler, Karl-Anton Hiller, Tim Maisch, Wolfgang Buchalla, Elmar Hellwig, André Gessner, Ali Al-Ahmad, Fabian Cieplik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,376,946
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,603
of 29,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,239
of 443,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#260
of 1,305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.