You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving the genetic system for Halorubrum lacusprofundi to allow in-frame deletions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1095621 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Johanna Gebhard, Iain G. Duggin, Susanne Erdmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 19% |
| Australia | 3 | 12% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
| Scientists | 12 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,275,374
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,678
of 29,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,990
of 423,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#34
of 1,106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.