↓ Skip to main content

The impact of transitive annotation on the training of taxonomic classifiers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of transitive annotation on the training of taxonomic classifiers
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1240957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harihara Subrahmaniam Muralidharan, Noam Y. Fox, Mihai Pop

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#14,584,707
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10,500
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,644
of 336,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#139
of 848 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 848 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.