You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A toolbox of machine learning software to support microbiome analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250806 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Judith Marcos-Zambrano, Víctor Manuel López-Molina, Burcu Bakir-Gungor, Marcus Frohme, Kanita Karaduzovic-Hadziabdic, Thomas Klammsteiner, Eliana Ibrahimi, Leo Lahti, Tatjana Loncar-Turukalo, Xhilda Dhamo, Andrea Simeon, Alina Nechyporenko, Gianvito Pio, Piotr Przymus, Alexia Sampri, Vladimir Trajkovik, Blanca Lacruz-Pleguezuelos, Oliver Aasmets, Ricardo Araujo, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos, Önder Aydemir, Magali Berland, M. Luz Calle, Michelangelo Ceci, Hatice Duman, Aycan Gündoğdu, Aki S. Havulinna, Kardokh Hama Najib Kaka Bra, Eglantina Kalluci, Sercan Karav, Daniel Lode, Marta B. Lopes, Patrick May, Bram Nap, Miroslava Nedyalkova, Inês Paciência, Lejla Pasic, Meritxell Pujolassos, Rajesh Shigdel, Antonio Susín, Ines Thiele, Ciprian-Octavian Truică, Paul Wilmes, Ercument Yilmaz, Malik Yousef, Marcus Joakim Claesson, Jaak Truu, Enrique Carrillo de Santa Pau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 13% |
| Colombia | 5 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 5% |
| India | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 51% |
| Scientists | 36 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 16% |
| Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#932,568
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#511
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,700
of 353,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9
of 841 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 841 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.