↓ Skip to main content

Functional domains of Acinetobacter bacteriophage tail fibers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional domains of Acinetobacter bacteriophage tail fibers
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1230997
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle L. Peters, Francis Gaudreault, Wangxue Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,997,174
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#12,949
of 29,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,754
of 157,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#59
of 438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.