You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Immune cell early activation, apoptotic kinetic, and T-cell functional impairment in domestic pigs after ASFV CADC_HN09 strain infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1328177 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yunfei Tian, Dongyue Wang, Shicheng He, Zhen Cao, Wencai Li, Fei Jiang, Yifan Shi, Yuxin Hao, Xinhao Wei, Qingqing Wang, Shuai Qie, Jiangtao Wang, Ting Li, Xiaoli Hao, Jianzhong Zhu, Jiajun Wu, Shaobin Shang, Xinyan Zhai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,734,944
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#16,506
of 29,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,909
of 212,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#174
of 547 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 547 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.