You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhancing iron biogeochemical cycling for canga ecosystem restoration: insights from microbial stimuli
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1352792 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rayara do Socorro Souza da Silva, Aline Figueiredo Cardoso, Rômulo Simões Angelica, José Augusto P. Bitencourt, Julio Cezar Fornazier Moreira, Adriano Reis Lucheta, Isabelle Gonçalves de Oliveira Prado, Dalber Ruben Sanchez Candela, Markus Gastauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2024.
All research outputs
#23,443,714
of 26,119,990 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#24,932
of 30,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,578
of 234,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#293
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,119,990 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.