↓ Skip to main content

Biological characteristics of the bacteriophage LDT325 and its potential application against the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological characteristics of the bacteriophage LDT325 and its potential application against the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1370332
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Liu, Bing Wang, Anqi Huang, Hua Zhang, Yubao Li, Lei Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,876,122
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#12,890
of 29,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,369
of 210,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#88
of 560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.