You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and classification of the genomes of novel microviruses in poultry slaughterhouse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1393153 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keming Xie, Benfu Lin, Xinyu Sun, Peng Zhu, Chang Liu, Guangfeng Liu, Xudong Cao, Jingqi Pan, Suiping Qiu, Xiaoqi Yuan, Mengshi Liang, Jingzhe Jiang, Lihong Yuan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#16,104,940
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#13,006
of 29,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,674
of 202,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#77
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.