↓ Skip to main content

Intrasegmental recombination as an evolutionary force of Lassa fever virus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intrasegmental recombination as an evolutionary force of Lassa fever virus
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1411537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng-Qiang He, Chao Kong, Mei He, Guan-Xiang Chen, Shu-Min Liu, Nai-Zheng Ding

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#14,701,104
of 26,071,599 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,895
of 30,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,780
of 193,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#45
of 432 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,071,599 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 432 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.