You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
LOV-based optogenetic devices: light-driven modules to impart photoregulated control of cellular signaling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashutosh Pudasaini, Kaley K. El-Arab, Brian D. Zoltowski |
| Abstract |
The Light-Oxygen-Voltage domain family of proteins is widespread in biology where they impart sensory responses to signal transduction domains. The small, light responsive LOV modules offer a novel platform for the construction of optogenetic tools. Currently, the design and implementation of these devices is partially hindered by a lack of understanding of how light drives allosteric changes in protein conformation to activate diverse signal transduction domains. Further, divergent photocycle properties amongst LOV family members complicate construction of highly sensitive devices with fast on/off kinetics. In the present review we discuss the history of LOV domain research with primary emphasis on tuning LOV domain chemistry and signal transduction to allow for improved optogenetic tools. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 462 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 22% |
| Researcher | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 56 | 12% |
| Unknown | 94 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 154 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 98 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 44 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 5% |
| Engineering | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 8% |
| Unknown | 95 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#12,710,400
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#750
of 3,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,481
of 264,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,742 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.