↓ Skip to main content

ParB Partition Proteins: Complex Formation and Spreading at Bacterial and Plasmid Centromeres

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ParB Partition Proteins: Complex Formation and Spreading at Bacterial and Plasmid Centromeres
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2016.00044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara E. Funnell

Abstract

In bacteria, active partition systems contribute to the faithful segregation of both chromosomes and low-copy-number plasmids. Each system depends on a site-specific DNA binding protein to recognize and assemble a partition complex at a centromere-like site, commonly called parS. Many plasmid, and all chromosomal centromere-binding proteins are dimeric helix-turn-helix DNA binding proteins, which are commonly named ParB. Although the overall sequence conservation among ParBs is not high, the proteins share similar domain and functional organization, and they assemble into similar higher-order complexes. In vivo, ParBs "spread," that is, DNA binding extends away from the parS site into the surrounding non-specific DNA, a feature that reflects higher-order complex assembly. ParBs bridge and pair DNA at parS and non-specific DNA sites. ParB dimers interact with each other via flexible conformations of an N-terminal region. This review will focus on the properties of the HTH centromere-binding protein, in light of recent experimental evidence and models that are adding to our understanding of how these proteins assemble into large and dynamic partition complexes at and around their specific DNA sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 25%
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 22%
Physics and Astronomy 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,468,369
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#1,963
of 3,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,508
of 337,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,810 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.