↓ Skip to main content

RNA Binding Protein Regulation and Cross-Talk in the Control of AU-rich mRNA Fate

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RNA Binding Protein Regulation and Cross-Talk in the Control of AU-rich mRNA Fate
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sofía M. García-Mauriño, Francisco Rivero-Rodríguez, Alejandro Velázquez-Cruz, Marian Hernández-Vellisca, Antonio Díaz-Quintana, Miguel A. De la Rosa, Irene Díaz-Moreno

Abstract

mRNA metabolism is tightly orchestrated by highly-regulated RNA Binding Proteins (RBPs) that determine mRNA fate, thereby influencing multiple cellular functions across biological contexts. Here, we review the interplay between six well-known RBPs (TTP, AUF-1, KSRP, HuR, TIA-1, and TIAR) that recognize AU-rich elements (AREs) at the 3' untranslated regions of mRNAs, namely ARE-RBPs. Examples of the links between their cross-regulations and modulation of their targets are analyzed during mRNA processing, turnover, localization, and translational control. Furthermore, ARE recognition can be self-regulated by several factors that lead to the prevalence of one RBP over another. Consequently, we examine the factors that modulate the dynamics of those protein-RNA transient interactions to better understand the final consequences of the regulation mediated by ARE-RBPs. For instance, factors controlling the RBP isoforms, their conformational state or their post-translational modifications (PTMs) can strongly determine the fate of the protein-RNA complexes. Moreover, mRNA specific sequence and secondary structure or subtle environmental changes are also key determinants to take into account. To sum up, the whole understanding of such a fine tuned regulation is a challenge for future research and requires the integration of all the available structural and functional data by in vivo, in vitro and in silico approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 50 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 14%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 54 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2017.
All research outputs
#13,829,062
of 23,573,233 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#989
of 4,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,745
of 328,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.