↓ Skip to main content

Improved in Vitro Folding of the Y2 G Protein-Coupled Receptor into Bicelles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved in Vitro Folding of the Y2 G Protein-Coupled Receptor into Bicelles
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Schmidt, Brian J. Bender, Anette Kaiser, Khushboo Gulati, Holger A. Scheidt, Heidi E. Hamm, Jens Meiler, Annette G. Beck-Sickinger, Daniel Huster

Abstract

Prerequisite for structural studies on G protein-coupled receptors is the preparation of highly concentrated, stable, and biologically active receptor samples in milligram amounts of protein. Here, we present an improved protocol for Escherichia coli expression, functional refolding, and reconstitution into bicelles of the human neuropeptide Y receptor type 2 (Y2R) for solution and solid-state NMR experiments. The isotopically labeled receptor is expressed in inclusion bodies and purified using SDS. We studied the details of an improved preparation protocol including the in vitro folding of the receptor, e.g., the native disulfide bridge formation, the exchange of the denaturating detergent SDS, and the functional reconstitution into bicelle environments of varying size. Full pharmacological functionality of the Y2R preparation was shown by a ligand affinity of 4 nM and G-protein activation. Further, simple NMR experiments are used to test sample quality in high micromolar concentration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 38%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 38%
Chemistry 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#5,666,292
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#463
of 3,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,450
of 441,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,869 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.