You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Aromatic Amino Acid Metabolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qian Han, Robert S. Phillips, Jianyong Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,604,817
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#745
of 3,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,434
of 353,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,960 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.