↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Applications of biological networks in biomedicine

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Applications of biological networks in biomedicine
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1005183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinicius Maracaja-Coutinho, Alex Di Genova, Anne Siegel, Mauricio Latorre

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#16,621,302
of 25,243,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#1,576
of 4,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,091
of 475,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#91
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,243,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,656 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.