You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Phenotype-based drug screening: An in vivo strategy to classify and identify the chemical compounds modulating zebrafish M-cell regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1081922 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ankita Kumari, Xin-An Zeng, Abdul Rahaman, Muhammad Adil Farooq, Yanyan Huang, Mahafooj Alee, Runyu Yao, Murtaza Ali, Ibrahim Khalifa, Omnia Badr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,116,068
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#1,199
of 4,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,930
of 470,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#60
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.