↓ Skip to main content

Example for process validation in biobanking: Fit for purpose testing of a cryopreservation method without isopentane

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Example for process validation in biobanking: Fit for purpose testing of a cryopreservation method without isopentane
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2022.876670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monika Wieser, Stefanie Burger, Reinhard Ertl, Stefan Kummer, Melanie Stargardt, Ingrid Walter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Sports and Recreations 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#20,453,782
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#2,564
of 3,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,382
of 437,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#231
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.