↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Intersection of biophysical and structural approaches in vaccine design

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Intersection of biophysical and structural approaches in vaccine design
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1142656
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher P. Ptak, Ching-Lin Hsieh, James A. Garnett, Rino Rappuoli, Yi-Pin Lin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#18,945,879
of 23,477,147 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#2,080
of 4,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,174
of 422,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#113
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,477,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.