You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review reveals conflicting evidence for the prevalence of antibodies against the sialic acid ‘xenoautoantigen’ Neu5Gc in humans and the need for a standardised approach to quantification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1390711 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esme Hutton, Emma Scott, Craig N. Robson, Nathalie Signoret, Martin A. Fascione |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,210,784
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#1,116
of 4,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,283
of 168,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.