↓ Skip to main content

Normal Aging does Not Impair Orbitofrontal-Dependent Reinforcer Devaluation Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Normal Aging does Not Impair Orbitofrontal-Dependent Reinforcer Devaluation Effects
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2011.00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teghpal Singh, Joshua L. Jones, Michael A. McDannald, Richard Z. Haney, Domenic Hayden Cerri, Geoffrey Schoenbaum

Abstract

Normal aging is associated with deficits in cognitive flexibility thought to depend on prefrontal regions such as the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Here, we used Pavlovian reinforcer devaluation to test whether normal aging might also affect the ability to use outcome expectancies to guide appropriate behavioral responding, which is also known to depend on the OFC. Both young and aged rats were trained to associate a 10-s conditioned stimulus (CS+) with delivery of a sucrose pellet. After training, half of the rats in each age group received the sucrose pellets paired with illness induced by LiCl injections; the remaining rats received sucrose and illness explicitly unpaired. Subsequently, responding to the CS+ was assessed in an extinction probe test. Although aged rats displayed lower responding levels overall, both young and aged rats conditioned to the CS+ and developed a conditioned taste aversion following reinforcer devaluation. Furthermore, during the extinction probe test, both young and aged rats spontaneously attenuated conditioned responding to the cue as a result of reinforcer devaluation. These data show that normal aging does not affect the ability to use expected outcome value to appropriately guide Pavlovian responding. This result indicates that deficits in cognitive flexibility are dissociable from other known functions of prefrontal - and particularly orbitofrontal - cortex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 29 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 30%
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 30%
Neuroscience 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,018
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,021
of 4,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,211
of 180,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.