↓ Skip to main content

Virtual navigation strategies from childhood to senescence: evidence for changes across the life span

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Virtual navigation strategies from childhood to senescence: evidence for changes across the life span
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2012.00028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronique D. Bohbot, Sam McKenzie, Kyoko Konishi, Celine Fouquet, Vanessa Kurdi, Russel Schachar, Michel Boivin, Philippe Robaey

Abstract

This study sought to investigate navigational strategies across the life span, by testing 8-years old children to 80-years old healthy older adults on the 4 on 8 virtual maze (4/8VM). The 4/8VM was previously developed to assess spontaneous navigational strategies, i.e., hippocampal-dependent spatial strategies (navigation by memorizing relationships between landmarks) versus caudate nucleus-dependent response strategies (memorizing a series of left and right turns from a given starting position). With the 4/8VM, we previously demonstrated greater fMRI activity and gray matter in the hippocampus of spatial learners relative to response learners. A sample of 599 healthy participants was tested in the current study. Results showed that 84.4% of children, 46.3% of young adults, and 39.3% of older adults spontaneously used spatial strategies (p < 0.0001). Our results suggest that while children predominantly use spatial strategies, the proportion of participants using spatial strategies decreases across the life span, in favor of response strategies. Factors promoting response strategies include repetition, reward and stress. Since response strategies can result from successful repetition of a behavioral pattern, we propose that the increase in response strategies is a biological adaptive mechanism that allows for the automatization of behavior such as walking in order to free up hippocampal-dependent resources. However, the down-side of this shift from spatial to response strategies occurs if people stop building novel relationships, which occurs with repetition and routine, and thereby stop stimulating their hippocampus. Reduced fMRI activity and gray matter in the hippocampus were shown to correlate with cognitive deficits in normal aging. Therefore, these results have important implications regarding factors involved in healthy and successful aging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 185 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 22%
Student > Master 27 14%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 28 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 32%
Neuroscience 33 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Computer Science 8 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 39 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,735,301
of 24,079,335 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#462
of 5,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,480
of 250,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,079,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.