You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metalloproteomics: principles, challenges and applications to neurodegeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amber Lothian, Dominic J. Hare, Rudolf Grimm, Timothy M. Ryan, Colin L. Masters, Blaine R. Roberts |
| Abstract |
Trace elements are required for a variety of normal biological functions. As our understanding of neurodegenerative disease advances we are identifying a number of metalloenzymes involved in disease process. Thus, the future of metals in neurobiology will rely more on detailed information regarding what metalloenzymes are present and how they are involved in the pathophysiology of disease. To gain this detailed information, we will rely less on bulk measures of the amount of a trace elements in a particular tissue and turn to metalloproteomic techniques to help elucidate both metalloprotein structure and function. Recent advances in metalloproteomics will translate to a richer understanding of the mechanism and precise role of metalloenzymes and proteins in the brain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 29 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,900,799
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#529
of 4,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,033
of 283,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#10
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.