↓ Skip to main content

Telephone-based screening tools for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in aging studies: a review of validated instruments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telephone-based screening tools for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in aging studies: a review of validated instruments
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teresa C. Castanho, Liliana Amorim, Joseph Zihl, Joana A. Palha, Nuno Sousa, Nadine C. Santos

Abstract

The decline of cognitive function in old age is a great challenge for modern society. The simultaneous increase in dementia and other neurodegenerative diseases justifies a growing need for accurate and valid cognitive assessment instruments. Although in-person testing is considered the most effective and preferred administration mode of assessment, it can pose not only a research difficulty in reaching large and diverse population samples, but it may also limit the assessment and follow-up of individuals with either physical or health limitations or reduced motivation. Therefore, telephone-based cognitive screening instruments can be an alternative and attractive strategy to in-person assessments. In order to give a current view of the state of the art of telephone-based tools for cognitive assessment in aging, this review highlights some of the existing instruments with particular focus on data validation, cognitive domains assessed, administration time and instrument limitations and advantages. From the review of the literature, performed using the databases EBSCO, Science Direct and PubMed, it was possible to verify that while telephone-based tools are useful in research and clinical practice, providing a promising approach, the methodologies still need refinement in the validation steps, including comparison with either single instruments or neurocognitive test batteries, to improve specificity and sensitivity to validly detect subtle changes in cognition that may precede cognitive impairment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 207 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 49 23%
Unknown 47 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 20%
Neuroscience 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 60 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,208,253
of 25,252,667 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#671
of 5,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,758
of 318,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,252,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.