You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The emerging role of nutrition in Parkinson's disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stacey E. Seidl, Jose A. Santiago, Hope Bilyk, Judith A. Potashkin |
| Abstract |
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease in ageing individuals. It is now clear that genetic susceptibility and environmental factors play a role in disease etiology and progression. Because environmental factors are involved with the majority of the cases of PD, it is important to understand the role nutrition plays in both neuroprotection and neurodegeneration. Recent epidemiological studies have revealed the promise of some nutrients in reducing the risk of PD. In contrast, other nutrients may be involved with the etiology of neurodegeneration or exacerbate disease progression. This review summarizes the studies that have addressed these issues and describes in detail the nutrients and their putative mechanisms of action in PD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 344 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 14% |
| Researcher | 44 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 67 | 19% |
| Unknown | 60 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 34 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 14% |
| Unknown | 81 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#440,855
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#92
of 5,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,729
of 236,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.