You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The drive-wise project: driving simulator training increases real driving performance in healthy older drivers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gianclaudio Casutt, Nathan Theill, Mike Martin, Martin Keller, Lutz Jäncke |
| Abstract |
Age-related cognitive decline is often associated with unsafe driving behavior. We hypothesized that 10 active training sessions in a driving simulator increase cognitive and on-road driving performance. In addition, driving simulator training should outperform cognitive training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 26% |
| Engineering | 16 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,019
of 4,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,831
of 226,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#42
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.