↓ Skip to main content

Degeneration of Neuromuscular Junction in Age and Dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Degeneration of Neuromuscular Junction in Age and Dystrophy
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rüdiger Rudolf, Muzamil Majid Khan, Siegfried Labeit, Michael R. Deschenes

Abstract

Functional denervation is a hallmark of aging sarcopenia as well as of muscular dystrophy. It is thought to be a major factor reducing skeletal muscle mass, particularly in the case of sarcopenia. Neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) serve as the interface between the nervous and skeletal muscular systems, and thus they may receive pathophysiological input of both pre- and post-synaptic origin. Consequently, NMJs are good indicators of motor health on a systemic level. Indeed, upon sarcopenia and dystrophy, NMJs morphologically deteriorate and exhibit altered characteristics of primary signaling molecules, such as nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and agrin. Since a remarkable reversibility of these changes can be observed by exercise, there is significant interest in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying synaptic deterioration upon aging and dystrophy and how synapses are reset by the aforementioned treatments. Here, we review the literature that describes the phenomena observed at the NMJ in sarcopenic and dystrophic muscle as well as to how these alterations can be reversed and to what extent. In a second part, the current information about molecular machineries underlying these processes is reported.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 228 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 19%
Student > Master 38 16%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Other 8 3%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 58 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 13%
Neuroscience 18 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 66 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,104,236
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,249
of 5,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,870
of 239,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#16
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.