↓ Skip to main content

Spread of activation and deactivation in the brain: does age matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spread of activation and deactivation in the brain: does age matter?
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian A. Gordon, Chun-Yu Tse, Gabriele Gratton, Monica Fabiani

Abstract

Cross-sectional aging functional MRI results are sometimes difficult to interpret, as standard measures of activation and deactivation may confound variations in signal amplitude and spread, which however, may be differentially affected by age-related changes in various anatomical and physiological factors. To disentangle these two types of measures, here we propose a novel method to obtain independent estimates of the peak amplitude and spread of the BOLD signal in areas activated (task-positive) and deactivated (task-negative) by a Sternberg task, in 14 younger and 28 older adults. The peak measures indicated that, compared to younger adults, older adults had increased activation of the task-positive network, but similar levels of deactivation in the task-negative network. Measures of signal spread revealed that older adults had an increased spread of activation in task-positive areas, but a starkly reduced spread of deactivation in task-negative areas. These effects were consistent across regions within each network. Further, there was greater variability in the anatomical localization of peak points in older adults, leading to reduced cross-subject overlap. These results reveal factors that may confound the interpretation of studies of aging. Additionally, spread measures may be linked to local connectivity phenomena and could be particularly useful to analyze age-related deactivation patterns, complementing the results obtained with standard peak and region of interest analyses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Hungary 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 46 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 28%
Psychology 13 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,242,136
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,273
of 4,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,479
of 255,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#64
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.