You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The age-related posterior-anterior shift as revealed by voxelwise analysis of functional brain networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00301 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul McCarthy, Lubica Benuskova, Elizabeth A. Franz |
| Abstract |
The posterior-anterior shift in aging (PASA) is a commonly observed phenomenon in functional neuroimaging studies of aging, characterized by age-related reductions in occipital activity alongside increases in frontal activity. In this work we have investigated the hypothesis as to whether the PASA is also manifested in functional brain network measures such as degree, clustering coefficient, path length and local efficiency. We have performed statistical analysis upon functional networks derived from a fMRI dataset containing data from healthy young, healthy aged, and aged individuals with very mild to mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). Analysis of both task based and resting state functional network properties has indicated that the PASA can also be characterized in terms of modulation of functional network properties, and that the onset of AD appears to accentuate this modulation. We also explore the effect of spatial normalization upon the results of our analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,389,490
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,029
of 4,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,328
of 262,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#53
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.