You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dissecting mechanisms of brain aging by studying the intrinsic excitability of neurons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valerio Rizzo, Jeffrey Richman, Sathyanarayanan V. Puthanveettil |
| Abstract |
Several studies using vertebrate and invertebrate animal models have shown aging associated changes in brain function. Importantly, changes in soma size, loss or regression of dendrites and dendritic spines and alterations in the expression of neurotransmitter receptors in specific neurons were described. Despite this understanding, how aging impacts intrinsic properties of individual neurons or circuits that govern a defined behavior is yet to be determined. Here we discuss current understanding of specific electrophysiological changes in individual neurons and circuits during aging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 20% |
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 36 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,633
of 4,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,498
of 352,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#22
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.