You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Swept-sine noise-induced damage as a hearing loss model for preclinical assays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorena Sanz, Silvia Murillo-Cuesta, Pedro Cobo, Rafael Cediel-Algovia, Julio Contreras, Teresa Rivera, Isabel Varela-Nieto, Carlos Avendaño |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,803,937
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,352
of 4,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,780
of 257,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#22
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.