↓ Skip to main content

Interaction between therapeutic interventions for Alzheimer’s disease and physiological Aβ clearance mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interaction between therapeutic interventions for Alzheimer’s disease and physiological Aβ clearance mechanisms
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher D. Morrone, Mingzhe Liu, Sandra E. Black, JoAnne McLaurin

Abstract

Most therapeutic agents are designed to target a molecule or pathway without consideration of the mechanisms involved in the physiological turnover or removal of that target. In light of this and in particular for Alzheimer's disease, a number of therapeutic interventions are presently being developed/investigated which target the amyloid-β peptide (Aβ). However, the literature has not adequately considered which Aβ physiological clearance pathways are necessary and sufficient for the effective action of these therapeutics. In this review, we evaluate the therapeutic strategies targeting Aβ presently in clinical development, discuss the possible interaction of these treatments with pathways that under normal physiological conditions are responsible for the turnover of Aβ and highlight possible caveats. We consider immunization strategies primarily reliant on a peripheral sink mechanism of action, small molecules that are reliant on entry into the CNS and thus degradation pathways within the brain, as well as lifestyle interventions that affect vascular, parenchymal and peripheral degradation pathways. We propose that effective development of Alzheimer's disease therapeutic strategies targeting Aβ peptide will require consideration of the age- and disease-specific changes to endogenous Aβ clearance mechanisms in order to elicit maximal efficacy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Other 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 14%
Neuroscience 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 24 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,056,505
of 24,129,125 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,340
of 5,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,042
of 268,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#24
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,129,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.