↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Auditory Training in Elderly Subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of Auditory Training in Elderly Subjects
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Albuquerque Morais, Caroline Nunes Rocha-Muniz, Eliane Schochat

Abstract

Auditory training (AT) has been used for auditory rehabilitation in elderly individuals and is an effective tool for optimizing speech processing in this population. However, it is necessary to distinguish training-related improvements from placebo and test-retest effects. Thus, we investigated the efficacy of short-term AT [acoustically controlled auditory training (ACAT)] in elderly subjects through behavioral measures and P300. Sixteen elderly individuals with auditory processing disorder (APD) received an initial evaluation (evaluation 1 - E1) consisting of behavioral and electrophysiological tests (P300 evoked by tone burst and speech sounds) to evaluate their auditory processing. The individuals were divided into two groups. The Active Control Group (n = 8) underwent placebo training. The Passive Control Group (n = 8) did not receive any intervention. After 12 weeks, the subjects were revaluated (evaluation 2 - E2). Then, all of the subjects underwent ACAT. Following another 12 weeks (eight training sessions), they underwent the final evaluation (evaluation 3 - E3). There was no significant difference between E1 and E2 in the behavioral test [F(9.6) = 0.06, p = 0.92, λ de Wilks = 0.65)] or P300 [F(8.7) = 2.11, p = 0.17, λ de Wilks = 0.29] (discarding the presence of placebo effects and test-retest). A significant improvement was observed between the pre- and post-ACAT conditions (E2 and E3) for all auditory skills according to the behavioral methods [F(4.27) = 0.18, p = 0.94, λ de Wilks = 0.97]. However, the same result was not observed for P300 in any condition. There was no significant difference between P300 stimuli. The ACAT improved the behavioral performance of the elderly for all auditory skills and was an effective method for hearing rehabilitation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
India 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 28 35%