↓ Skip to main content

Detecting early egocentric and allocentric impairments deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: an experimental study with virtual reality

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detecting early egocentric and allocentric impairments deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: an experimental study with virtual reality
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Serino, Francesca Morganti, Fabio Di Stefano, Giuseppe Riva

Abstract

Several studies have pointed out that egocentric and allocentric spatial impairments are one of the earliest manifestations of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). It is less clear how a break in the continuous interaction between these two representations may be a crucial marker to detect patients who are at risk to develop dementia. The main objective of this study is to compare the performances of participants suffering from amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI group), patients with AD (AD group) and a control group (CG), using a virtual reality (VR)-based procedure for assessing the abilities in encoding, storing and syncing different spatial representations. In the first task, participants were required to indicate on a real map the position of the object they had memorized, while in the second task they were invited to retrieve its position from an empty version of the same virtual room, starting from a different position. The entire procedure was repeated across three different trials, depending on the object location in the encoding phase. Our finding showed that aMCI patients performed significantly more poorly in the third trial of the first task, showing a deficit in the ability to encode and store an allocentric viewpoint independent representation. On the other hand, AD patients performed significantly more poorly when compared to the CG in the second task, indicating a specific impairment in storing an allocentric viewpoint independent representation and then syncing it with the allocentric viewpoint dependent representation. Furthermore, data suggested that these impairments are not a product of generalized cognitive decline or of general decay in spatial abilities, but instead may reflect a selective deficit in the spatial organization Overall, these findings provide an initial insight into the cognitive underpinnings of amnestic impairment in aMCI and AD patient exploiting the potentiality of VR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 181 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 20%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 45 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 29%
Neuroscience 26 14%
Computer Science 11 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 50 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,032,455
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,392
of 4,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,894
of 266,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#30
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.