↓ Skip to main content

Brain metabolic stress and neuroinflammation at the basis of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain metabolic stress and neuroinflammation at the basis of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernanda G. De Felice, Mychael V. Lourenco

Abstract

Brain metabolic dysfunction is known to influence brain activity in several neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). In fact, deregulation of neuronal metabolism has been postulated to play a key role leading to the clinical outcomes observed in AD. Besides deficits in glucose utilization in AD patients, recent evidence has implicated neuroinflammation and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress as components of a novel form of brain metabolic stress that develop in AD and other neurological disorders. Here we review findings supporting this novel paradigm and further discuss how these mechanisms seem to participate in synapse and cognitive impairments that are germane to AD. These deleterious processes resemble pathways that act in peripheral tissues leading to insulin resistance and glucose intolerance, in an intriguing molecular connection linking AD to diabetes. The discovery of detailed mechanisms leading to neuronal metabolic stress may be a key step that will allow the understanding how cognitive impairment develops in AD, thereby offering new avenues for effective disease prevention and therapeutic targeting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 178 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 19%
Neuroscience 29 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,163,551
of 23,392,375 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#654
of 4,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,886
of 267,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#11
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,392,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.