↓ Skip to main content

Pervasive Computing Technologies to Continuously Assess Alzheimer’s Disease Progression and Intervention Efficacy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pervasive Computing Technologies to Continuously Assess Alzheimer’s Disease Progression and Intervention Efficacy
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bayard E. Lyons, Daniel Austin, Adriana Seelye, Johanna Petersen, Jonathan Yeargers, Thomas Riley, Nicole Sharma, Nora Mattek, Katherine Wild, Hiroko Dodge, Jeffrey A. Kaye

Abstract

Traditionally, assessment of functional and cognitive status of individuals with dementia occurs in brief clinic visits during which time clinicians extract a snapshot of recent changes in individuals' health. Conventionally, this is done using various clinical assessment tools applied at the point of care and relies on patients' and caregivers' ability to accurately recall daily activity and trends in personal health. These practices suffer from the infrequency and generally short durations of visits. Since 2004, researchers at the Oregon Center for Aging and Technology (ORCATECH) at the Oregon Health and Science University have been working on developing technologies to transform this model. ORCATECH researchers have developed a system of continuous in-home monitoring using pervasive computing technologies that make it possible to more accurately track activities and behaviors and measure relevant intra-individual changes. We have installed a system of strategically placed sensors in over 480 homes and have been collecting data for up to 8 years. Using this continuous in-home monitoring system, ORCATECH researchers have collected data on multiple behaviors such as gait and mobility, sleep and activity patterns, medication adherence, and computer use. Patterns of intra-individual variation detected in each of these areas are used to predict outcomes such as low mood, loneliness, and cognitive function. These methods have the potential to improve the quality of patient health data and in turn patient care especially related to cognitive decline. Furthermore, the continuous real-world nature of the data may improve the efficiency and ecological validity of clinical intervention studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 311 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 15%
Researcher 46 15%
Student > Master 46 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Other 62 20%
Unknown 70 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 38 12%
Psychology 37 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 11%
Social Sciences 22 7%
Engineering 22 7%
Other 68 22%
Unknown 92 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,684,532
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,700
of 4,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,073
of 267,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#55
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.